🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the crisis caused by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – briefly – to have been defused. A senior US official spoke of "notable headway" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its countermove: another massive barrage of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Peace Talks and Military Action

The sequence of contrasting events captured the grim essence of the recent timeframe. By day, negotiation efforts are fought: optimistic declarations are released from various governments. Immense energy is devoted on restraining certain initiatives. By night, Moscow brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the primary tool for achieving "resolution".

Nocturnal Warfare

As the offensive unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was revealed. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from enemy soil, a capability afforded by current data. From observation points, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been dispatched to intercept incoming guided weapons roared overhead – advanced fighter aircraft delivered to Ukraine by NATO members.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's air-defence systems activated: multiple launches deployed against a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, most likely supplied through Western nations. Every firing jolts you unexpectedly, causing tremors. The brief panic quickly gives way to resigned acknowledgment: maybe the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, preventing destruction from devastation and another blackout.

Ongoing Risks

Not long after, a large-caliber weapon fired at a drone somewhere nearby, part of a rapid response unit – probably Western-made equipment. Unfortunately, the projectiles didn't strike the enemy aircraft – it maintained course toward its target.

Periodically, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv greeted the daybreak reports: seven people killed, devastation and heating outages in numerous residences as a result of the night's assault. As always, everyone still continued their routines – enduring hostilities. But those 24 hours encapsulated Ukraine's essential dependence on external assistance – a need that regional partners are evidently unprepared to substitute in the immediate future.

Failed Diplomacy

The comprehensive proposal from US administration provoked deep reactions, controversy and profound anxiety – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after earlier high-level meetings and multilateral gatherings.

Every new approach from US leadership unfolds according to the same pattern: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with partner nations, succeeds in resisting. They manage the tension but never actually secure success. This trend will, certainly, persist.

Political Considerations

It is tempting to accuse particular leaders of persistently promoting Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the whole story. American leadership works based on a assumption understood by experienced diplomats: you cannot win at the negotiating table what you have lost on the battlefield. The White House presumes that it is impossible to force Russia to surrender the areas that it already controls in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while accepting these circumstances, American administration does little to prevent Kremlin actions, through statements or actions, from believing that the current condition will not shift further in its favour in the months ahead.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, Russian leadership is convinced that the clock favors them – that Ukraine and its supporters are approaching exhaustion. Their incentive to sign a deal that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is virtually nonexistent. There may be multiple initiatives to end hostilities, but they will carry on as long as Russia's government remains supremely confident in the result.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, slowly losing lives and land but averting a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its benefit.

Existing Situation

Factually, there are no genuine requirements for a armistice. Now, subjective factors are becoming relevant: political desires to mediate resolution and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to unite the population around the country's interests against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their focus does not shift toward homefront challenges. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after recent developments, it remains highly unlikely that this will alter their fundamental strategy.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to eliminate the suggested clauses of the latest plan. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by Washington, resistance by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with soothing efforts of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new initiatives based on old ideas are approaching, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter diplomatic offensives from Washington that are based on Russian demands and show particular unwillingness to change the course of events, if they maintain solidarity and improve their protective measures at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the coming months, primarily depend on continued Western support.